9 comments on “The Trellick Tower: From Doom to Desire

  1. Great article which I enjoyed reading. I was engaged by your enthusiasm for the building. The world is a strange place, where eg the kidnapped can fall in love with their jailers, so I’m not criticising your views which are as valid as anyone’s. By the same token, I’m in the Fleming camp: this building and others of its ilk are IMHO crimes against humanity. I do not rejoice in ugliness and would happily see it demolished tomorrow. The idea that Goldfinger was paid to inflict this menacing eyesore on the world is a travesty, and that he thought it was good and beautiful surreal (in French ‘le comble’). His is the architecture of gas chambers: efficient, brutal machines – not for living (as Corbusier would have it) but for managing (sub-?)human ‘hordes’. As such it is a fitting monument to the human capacity for insensate totalitarianism.

    • Ian Fleming. Great novelist but was he an architectural critic? Sure, you might not like Trellick but there are plenty that do, and not just for aesthetic reasons but practical ones. Goldfinger belonged to a group of modernist architects who displayed attention to detail and used quality materials in their work. Decades before CAD software, he created a device to help measure the maximum amount of light in his buildings. He lived in Trellick’s sister building, Balfron Tower and took the views of its residents before building Trellick and moving his practice in there years later.

      The real villains of the peace are the councillors, shady contractors and shoddy workmanship that resulted in hastily built blocks like Ronan Point, which sullied the reputation of architects like Goldfinger. Housing policies that didn’t consider the diverse needs and socio-economic problems of residents. A lack of political will (from both red and blue governments) that ensured estates weren’t maintained, funded and working well. These are the real crimes against humanity. That Goldfinger’s buildings are still going strong says quite a bit.

      ‘His is the architecture of gas chambers’

      Why don’t you go online and find out about the residents who live in these ‘gas chambers’? Find out more about Lee Boland who talks passionately about living in Trellick. Or philosopher Nigel Warburton, who lived at Balfron for a while. He eventually wrote a book about the architect. I grew up on an estate, not far from Ronan Point. Yes, I know about Trellick’s reputation as the ‘tower of terror’. I also know how its tenants were given greater autonomy over their living conditions and now the building has sort-after apartments. High rise living may not be for everyone, but there are many who make it work. His listed towers are here to stay. We need to add more to the debate than just ‘mock-Tudor = good’ and ‘concrete = bad’.

      • Many thanks for the detailed comment. I personally adore the Trellick tower, especially the view at night when hurtling past on the Westway; one of London’s greatest sights.

        I also have relatives who live in Glenkerry House; it’s a wonderful residence and lovingly cared for by the residents.

      • Good response to polemical comment. I have no issue with alternative views, world would be a boring place if so. Where I agree with you is on the issue of quality. However, mock tudor goes into the bin also. Maybe not “tomorrow’s slums today” – as most of the housing developments built in this country – but certainly “tasteless tat for today and tomorrow” :-)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s